Ms. Goodie Two-Shoes

You better watch out . . .
He’s making a list,
checking it twice,

gonna find out
Who’s naughty and nice.

He knows if you’ve been bad or good,
So be good for goodness sake!

Before we’ve even digested the Thanksgiving turkey, children are being reminded of who’s watching them. With toys and gifts on the line, behavior usually steps up a notch. I must admit, as much as I’ve never really liked the idea of being a snitch to Santa, I’ve dropped his name a time or two in total desperation.

But even if I hadn’t, I’ve certainly used “good” to describe my child before. They made a good decision, they showed good behavior, they were good boys or girls.

Author Rachel Simmons believes this type of thinking is harmful to our children, particularly our daughters. In her book The Curse of the Good Girl: Raising Authentic Girls with Courage and Confidence, Simmons argues that “the most critical freedom we can give our daughters is the liberty not only to listen to their inner voice, but to act on it.”

I first was exposed to Simmons and her ideas when I took my daughters to hear her speak at our local high school.   Before I attended, I wondered:

What’s so wrong with being good?

Simmons explains:

Being Good is a fundamentally self-limiting experience: the need to be ‘perfect’ and ‘do everything right’ leaves many girls uncomfortable with feedback and failure, making it difficult to push through a challenge. The need to be nice or right at all costs leaves these girls on the sidelines as they avoid the situations that aren’t sure things: moments of self-assertion that require healthy risk-taking and which might lead to failure, disappointment or another person’s unhappiness. (p 6)

Not only do Good girls avoid risk, they also avoid conflict and become pleasers. They think in all-or-nothing terms “If I am not nice, I am mean” (or as I view it “if I am not good, I must be bad/selfish”) and view every conflict as a threat to the relationship and personal. They then avoid it even at the cost of sacrificing their own needs.

The need to focus on how you seem to others, rather than who you are, is the Curse of the Good Girl in action. . . .

Taught to value niceness over honesty, perfection over growth and modesty over authentic self-expression, girls are locked into a battle with a version of themselves they can never attain. Their internal resources are drained by the energy and ruthless self-evaluation required to live up to this impossible set of personal standards. (pg 250)

I have spent most of my own life learning and living those values. In the LDS church (probably any church, this just happens to be the one I go to), there’s a lot of talk about what good people do, think, believe, dress, even value and desire. We take Christ’s admonition to be perfect quite literally, so when I go to Relief Society and we are talking about sin, the most anyone is willing to publicly fess up to is “when I read my scriptures daily, sometimes I don’t really ponder them.”

There’s an unwritten message that anything I do for myself at the expense of what I could be doing for someone else (other than those things that are on the “Good Girl Preapproved List” such as personal prayer, scriptures study, etc.) means I am being selfish.

It’s almost as if we are scared that if left to our own desires and values, we will be out of control living with reckless abandon for all that is right and good (we all know the words of the Cyndi Lauper song, don’t we?).

The antidote to being the Good girl according to Simmons is to be the Real girl. It goes back to what Laurie observed in Get Real that the key to spirituality is authenticity.

Simmons describes the Real Girl like this:

A Real Girl stays connected to a strong inner core of her thoughts, feelings and desires. She is able not only to listen to who she is but to act on it. She maintains a critical balance: she can mange the needs of others without sacrificing the integrity of her own. (pg 10)

She wants every girl to have the “tools and permission to be herself, whoever that is.” (pg 12, emphasis mine)

Do I have the courage to let my daughters be who they really are? I realized they don’t have a single example of this in their lives. From church to home life, they are constantly told what they should do and be. I decide what is a good grade, a good decision, a good girl, not them. And maybe it’s because I haven’t figured out how to really be me, whoever that is. Thus, the hardest words to read in the book were these:

Be the change you wish to see in your daughter. (pg 244)

I’m interested to know what role “Good” plays in your life. Where is the line between sharing our own values with our someone else and allowing them to be whoever it is they are?